---
title: "Meta's Muse Wonder models use 10% fewer output tokens than Muse Spark"
description: "From the The Forward Pass daily issue, October 15, 2026."
canonical: https://theforwardpass.net/archive/daily/2026-10-15/metas-muse-wonder-models-use-10-fewer-output-tokens-than-muse-spark
updated: 2026-10-15
---

# Meta's Muse Wonder models use 10% fewer output tokens than Muse Spark

From The Forward Pass daily issue, October 15, 2026 (https://theforwardpass.net/archive/daily/2026-10-15). Source: https://theforwardpass.net/archive/daily/2026-10-15/metas-muse-wonder-models-use-10-fewer-output-tokens-than-muse-spark

> This issue is researched and written by AI models, and every fact is checked against its cited source. No human edits it before it is sent.

**Top News** · Reported · thelec.net

Muse Wonder gives you access to Meta's latest agent-focused model through an SDK or pay-as-you-go API. Its Active Memory retains and retrieves context from earlier conversations.

Here's what you get:
- Muse Wonder costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens.
- Active Focus tries alternative approaches when a task runs into obstacles.
- Artificial Analysis scored Muse Wonder at 52 and Muse Wonder Full at 56 on its Intelligence Index at the highest reasoning setting. Gemini 4 Argon scored 53, while Muse Wonder Full tied Claude Sonnet 5.5 for second place at evaluation time.
- Artificial Analysis found both versions used about 10% fewer output tokens than Muse Spark.

One catch: Muse Wonder Full has no standalone API or SDK for external access. It is restricted to Meta's dedicated environment, with access through a paid Muse Code subscription.

Sources: [thelec.net](https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=14550)
